Thursday, January 28, 2010

Are You Middle-Class?

The other day, while driving, I listened to one of America’s more talked about radio talk-show host claim that our President is stirring up a “class-war”.  He wanted the listeners to count the number of times President Obama used the phrase “working-class”, as it is, in his words, the “code word for class warfare”.  I was going to watch the State of the Union Address, by President Obama, on Wednesday night, regardless, so I decided to do what I was asked and “count”.  (My first conclusion is that, regardless of which political party you belong to or believe in, there is no denying that President Obama can speak to an audience.)  By my count, he mentioned the phrase “working families” three times, the phrase “middle-class” five times, “working” eight times, and “job” either twenty-two or twenty-three times.  Clearly, the emphasis was on jobs, not class warfare.  

 

This morning, while watching CNBC, I saw an interview with Indra Nooyi, Chairman and CEO of Pepsico, where she discussed what Pepsico’s research is telling them about the US consumer.  It is clear to Pepsico that those that work in labor-oriented jobs, those with less education, are those that are being hit the hardest by unemployment.  Moreover, she indicates that consumers are spending less, regardless of the unemployment rates in their communities.  That is, they are being more cautious, regardless of their personal situation.  It is an insightful interview that concludes that we need more jobs and a well-educated workforce. 

 

This all led me to wonder, do people know what “class” they are in?   Do they care?  So, here are the statistics from the US Department of Labor’s Consumer Expenditure Survey from 2008 (the most recent on their website).  What the table below shows is, simply, how each quintile (five equal size groups), defined by income, makes and spends their money as a percentage of their income.  If we define “class” by income then these would be lower-, lower-middle-, middle-, upper-middle, and upper-class.  I will put a column for the national average, as well.  So, are you middle class – the quintile in the third 20 percent (quintile)?

 

Item

All Consumer Units

Lowest 20%

Second 20%

Middle 20%

Fourth 20%

Highest 20%

Income/Expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

After-tax Income

$61,744

$10,608

$27,843

$46,936

$72,628

$150,692

Average Annual Expenditures

$50,486

$22,304

$31,751

$42,659

$58,632

$97,003

Sources of Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wages

80.2%

42.4%

62.4%

76.8%

84.1%

85.0%

Social Security, Unemployment and Public Assistance

 

11.3%

 

59.0%

 

31.7%

 

16.8%

 

9.2%

 

4.0%

Interest, Dividends, & Property Income

 

2.4%

 

1.9%

 

1.9%

 

1.9%

 

1.9%

 

2.9%

Demographics

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Age

49.1

51.6

51.6

47.9

46.9

47.4

Earners

1.3

0.5

0.9

1.4

1.7

2.0

Homeowner%

66%

39%

56%

67%

79%

91%

White Race%

88%

81%

85%

88%

91%

94%

College Educated%

60%

44%

46%

58%

68%

84%

Expenditure Category%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food%

12.8%

15.6%

14.4%

13.1%

12.9%

11.3%

Alcoholic Beverages%

0.9%

0.8%

0.9%

0.8%

0.9%

0.9%

Housing%

33.9%

39.9%

36.5%

35.0%

33.0%

31.7%

Apparel%

3.6%

4.3%

3.6%

3.2%

3.5%

3.6%

Transportation%

17.0%

15.4%

17.8%

18.4%

17.9%

16.1%

Healthcare%

5.9%

7.3%

7.7%

6.8%

6.0%

4.5%

Entertainment%

5.6%

4.9%

5.4%

5.7%

5.6%

5.8%

Personal Care%

1.2%

1.4%

1.3%

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

Reading%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

Education%

2.1%

2.8%

1.1%

1.2%

1.4%

3.0%

Tobacco%

0.6%

1.2%

1.0%

0.8%

0.7%

0.3%

Miscellaneous%

1.7%

1.3%

1.6%

1.8%

1.6%

1.7%

Personal Taxes%

2.8%

-3.4%

-1.5%

0.6%

2.0%

5.0%

 

Clearly, this can create a lot of questions, as well as provide a few answers.  I contend that your financial success has little to do with your income and more to do with how you save your income, spend your income, and act about your income.  Economists often define the “classes” based on an economic resource definition, such as income.  Sociologist and political philosophers define “class” based on who is “powerful” and who is “powerless”.  Seems to me that a person, particularly a young person, has control over their income, through educational attainment and hard work, and, thus, they have power.  Moreover, we can always save our money in order to create, over time, a greater resource base.  What I’m saying is that your class has more to do with your “power” over your attitude and aspirations than it does about your money.

 

So, are you middle-class? 

 

Thursday, January 21, 2010

RAL Season

RAL Season[i]

 

Once, when Albert Einstein was asked about his US taxes, he replied, “This is too difficult for a mathematician. It takes a philosopher.”  Many people would agree, and should, as the US Tax Code is not only mathematical, it is full of code which, by design, favors certain behaviors, subsidizes some expenditures, and attempts to employ a progressive tax system - where those that receive the most income are supposed to pay a greater percentage of their income in tax.  These rules, the widely-held belief that others get “tax-breaks” that the taxpayer covets, coupled with the fact that many citizens should have paid more attention in math class, leads tax filers to utilize paid tax services.  This is particularly true of America's most financially vulnerable taxpayers - those from low- and moderate-income families.  In 2008, it is estimated that these consumer lost (paid) about $800 million of their refunds to tax-preparers offering fast (and tempting) tax refund anticipation loans (RALs), an often unnecessary and costly product.  We have entered RAL season.

 

Consumer advocates at the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), the Consumer Federation of America (CFA), as well as our University of Missouri Office for Financial Success and the University of Missouri Extension Service are warning taxpayers to stay away from refund anticipation loans (RALs).  RALs are an avoidable tax-season expense, as long as the taxpayer is armed with this knowledge and has the patience to wait a few days for their tax refund. As mentioned above, data from 2008 found that RALs decreased the refunds of about 8.4 million American taxpayers, through charging $738 million in loan fees, $68 million in other fees, while another 12 million taxpayers spent $360 million on related financial products, as a means to receive their refunds.

 

In several instances, federal regulator actions have been taken against RAL lenders, putting them out of business.  Some tax preparation services have lost their source of RAL funding, as a result.  Other RAL lenders have lowered the price of RALs to levels more similar to “mainstream” tax-preparers but, even with lower prices, RALs remain on the “Avoid” list of products. How do you avoid them?  It is easy, just say, “NO!”

 

You might wonder what makes RALs so bad for consumers, especially when the consumer might think they need the money now, as opposed to later.  First, RALs are loans where the taxpayer's expected refund is to repay the debt.  Typically, the wait for a refund from an electronically filed tax return is under three weeks and it is estimated that most taxpayers receive their refund in two weeks, without the costly loan.  Yet, quick money is always a temptation and those that are the most tempted are usually the same people that could use the full amount of their refund – not their refund less the cost of the RAL.

 

So, what are the costs of a RAL?  First, taxpayers (really “borrowers” in this case) must pay a loan fee ranging from $34 to $130.  Tax preparers may, also, charge one or more separate add-on fees, ranging from $25 to several hundred dollars.  The price of RALs has dropped significantly for loans in the $1,000 to $4,000 range, as the price of an average RAL of $3,300 has decreased from over $100 in 2007 to about $65 in 2010.  The biggest cost to the consumer, however, is the effective annual percentage rate (APR).  The APR for a RAL ranges from about 50% (for a larger RAL) to nearly 500% (for a smaller RAL).  It is estimated that, when all fees are appropriately included, the APRs range from about 85% to nearly 1,300%. For example, the average RAL of $3,300 carries an average APR of 72%.  If you want an instant RAL (for an additional fee), the effective APR for $1,500 RALs were found to range from 185% to 211%.  (Would ever agree to pay this great of a rate of interest for a credit card, car loan, or home mortgage?  I hope not.)

 

So, what do you do, if you need help with preparing your taxes?  First, look for Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) sites, like our MoTax program from Missouri Cooperative Extension.  Remember, VITA volunteers are certified by the IRS to be qualified in preparing taxes and they do so without cost (i.e., it is free).  They do not offer RALs but they might offer some advice on how you can lower your taxes or use your refund to help your quest toward financial success.  Click on the following, to see a list of all the VITA sites in the United States, in order to find one near you.  If you know that your parents use a “store-front” tax preparer, ask mom or dad if they typically get a Refund Anticipation Loan or if they pay extra to get their refund sooner.  If they do, ask them to read this Financial Tip and show them the list of VITA sites in your community.  

 

Finally, while the IRS and the Office of Comptroller of Currency (OCC) have increased the regulatory requirement for tax preparers, they cannot police the tax-filing marketplace as well as we, the US consumer.  If everyone would stop using these overpriced, abusive products, the products would soon cease to exist and more people would be able to use their money in pursuit of their financial success.  This solution begins with you, ends with you, and doesn’t cost the US Government a dime of our tax dollars.  You have to love the price of an informed, responsible citizenry.

 

POSTCRIPT:  For more information:  NCLC and CFA will be publishing their annual comprehensive report on the RAL industry, regulation, and litigation later in February 2010. The report will be available on NCLC's website at www.consumerlaw.org or on CFA's website at www.consumerfed.org .

 

A coalition of state and local consumer groups will be releasing reports on RALs for their regions, including the Community Reinvestment Association of North Carolina (www.cra-nc.org ), NEDAP (www.nedap.org ), Woodstock Institute (www.woodstockinst.org) and the California Reinvestment Coalition (www.calreinvest.org ).



[i] Much of this week’s Financial Tip was motivated from an emailed newsletter from the National Consumer Law Center.  It was authored by Chi Chi Wu.